🔗 Share this article

A man named Tomas Anez Dos Santos was laboring in a small open space deep in the Peruvian Amazon when he heard footsteps drawing near through the thick jungle.

He realized he was encircled, and stood still.

“One positioned, directing using an bow and arrow,” he recalls. “Unexpectedly he noticed I was here and I commenced to flee.”

He found himself encountering members of the Mashco Piro. For a long time, Tomas—who lives in the modest village of Nueva Oceania—served as almost a neighbor to these nomadic people, who avoid engagement with outsiders.

A recent study from a rights organization indicates remain a minimum of 196 described as “remote communities” left in the world. This tribe is believed to be the largest. The report claims 50% of these communities might be wiped out in the next decade if governments neglect to implement more actions to defend them.

The report asserts the most significant dangers stem from deforestation, digging or drilling for oil. Uncontacted groups are extremely at risk to ordinary sickness—consequently, the report states a risk is presented by contact with religious missionaries and social media influencers seeking attention.

Recently, members of the tribe have been venturing to Nueva Oceania more and more, based on accounts from inhabitants.

Nueva Oceania is a fishing hamlet of a handful of clans, perched atop on the edges of the Tauhamanu River deep within the Peruvian jungle, a ten-hour journey from the nearest village by boat.

This region is not designated as a protected reserve for remote communities, and logging companies function here.

Tomas says that, on occasion, the noise of logging machinery can be detected day and night, and the community are witnessing their jungle disrupted and ruined.

Within the village, residents state they are divided. They are afraid of the projectiles but they also possess strong admiration for their “kin” who live in the forest and desire to defend them.

“Let them live in their own way, we are unable to modify their way of life. For this reason we keep our distance,” says Tomas.

Inhabitants in Nueva Oceania are anxious about the harm to the tribe's survival, the danger of aggression and the likelihood that timber workers might introduce the community to sicknesses they have no resistance to.

While we were in the village, the Mashco Piro made themselves known again. A young mother, a woman with a two-year-old child, was in the forest gathering produce when she noticed them.

“We detected calls, shouts from others, many of them. Like it was a crowd calling out,” she told us.

It was the initial occasion she had met the Mashco Piro and she ran. Subsequently, her thoughts was continually racing from anxiety.

“As there are deforestation crews and operations destroying the forest they are fleeing, possibly because of dread and they arrive near us,” she explained. “We don't know how they will behave towards us. That is the thing that terrifies me.”

In 2022, a pair of timber workers were attacked by the Mashco Piro while fishing. One man was hit by an projectile to the stomach. He recovered, but the other man was located deceased subsequently with multiple injuries in his physique.

The administration has a approach of no engagement with isolated people, establishing it as prohibited to initiate contact with them.

The policy originated in the neighboring country following many years of campaigning by tribal advocacy organizations, who noted that early contact with isolated people lead to entire groups being eliminated by disease, poverty and starvation.

During the 1980s, when the Nahau people in the country first encountered with the world outside, 50% of their people died within a few years. In the 1990s, the Muruhanua people experienced the same fate.

“Remote tribes are extremely susceptible—from a disease perspective, any exposure could spread sicknesses, and including the basic infections could eliminate them,” says an advocate from a local advocacy organization. “In cultural terms, any interaction or disruption can be very harmful to their life and well-being as a community.”

For local residents of {